Biomass Yield, Chemical Composition and Potential Ethanol Yields of 8 Cultivars of Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) Harvested 3-Monthly in Central Thailand

Kannika Rengsirikul, Yasuyuki Ishii, Kunn Kangvansaichol, Prapa Sripichitt, Vittaya Punsuvon, Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Ganda Nakamanee, Sayan Tudsri

Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasetsart Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Product Improvement Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nakhonratchasima Animal Nutrition Research and Development Center, Nakhonratchasima, Thailand.
PTT Public Company Limited, Ayutthaya, Thailand.

DOI: 10.4236/jsbs.2013.32015                

Abstract

Eight cultivars of napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.), namely Dwarf, Muaklek, Bana, Taiwan A148, Common, Wruk wona, Tifton and Kampheng San, were grown in central Thailand in 2008-2009 and biomass yield, chemical composition and theoretical ethanol yield were measured. Harvests were made every 3 months. Biomass yield and cell wall compositions differed significantly (P < 0.05) among cultivars. Tifton produced the highest annual biomass yield at 58.3 t/ha followed by Wruk wona (52.1 t/ha), while the lowest yield of 27.1 t/ha was in Dwarf. Biomass yield varied with season with highest yields in May and lowest in February during the dry season. Cell wall concentrations were higher in the tall cultivars than in the short ones (Dwarf and Muaklek) (P < 0.05). Theoretical ethanol conversion efficiency ranged from 350 to 460 L/t DM among the cultivars following pretreatment with steam explosion. While a number of cultivars showed significant potential for use as biofuels in central Thailand, Tifton seemed to be the most promising.

Keywords

Bioenergy; Biomass Yield; Cultivar; Pennisetum purpureum; Season

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	EPPO, “Energy Statistics,” 2010. http://www.eppo.go.th/info/index.html
[2]	DEDE, “Renewable Energy Development Plans,” 2010. http://61.19.246.165/~energy/redps.php?id=24
[3]	M. Hoshino, “Studies on the Tropical Forage Crop in Thailand,” Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Japan, 1975.
[4]	S. Tudsri, S. T. Jorgensen, P. Riddach and A. Pookpakdi, “Effect of Cutting Height and Dry Season Closing Date on Yield and Quality of Five Napier Grass Cultivars in Thailand,” Tropical Grassland, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 147-148.
[5]	T. Tekletsadis, S. Tudsri, S. Juntakool and S. Prasanpanich, “Effect of Dry Season Cutting Management on Subsequent Forage Yield and Quality of Ruzi (Brachiaria ruziziensis) and Dwarf Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) in Thailand,” Kasetsart Journal, Vol. 40, 2004, pp. 159-160.
[6]	S. Ketkamalas, “Effect of Variety and Cutting Stage on Yield and Nutritive Value of Napier Silage,” M.Sc. Thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 2006 (in Thai).
[7]	A. Prochnow, M. Heiermann, M. Plochl, T. Amon and P. J. Hobbs, “Bioenergy from Permanent Grassland—A Review: 2. Combustion,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, No. 21, 2009, pp. 4945-4954. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.069
[8]	S. N. Naik, V. V. Goud, P. K. Rout and A. K. Dalai, “Production of First and Second Generation Biofuels: A Comprehensive Review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2010, pp. 578-597. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003
[9]	AOAC, “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 18th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, 2005.
[10]	OMAF, “Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizer,” Japan, 1987.
[11]	H. K. Goering and P. J. Van Soest, “Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications),” Agriculture Handbook No. 379, United States Department of Agriculture, 1970.
[12]	US Department of Energy, “Theoretical Ethanol Yield Calculation,” 2009. http://1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_yield_calculator.htm
[13]	L. Khairani, Y. Ishii, S. Idota, R. F. Utamy and A. Nishiwaki, “Variation in Growth Attributes, Dry Matter Yield and Quality among 6 Genotypes of Napier Grass Used for Biomass in Year of Establishment in Southern Kyushu, Japan,” Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012. doi:ajar.0000.50058.50058
[14]	J. S. Yuan, K. H. Tiller, H. Al-Ahmad, N. R. Stewart and C. N. Stewart Jr., “Plants to Power: Bioenergy to Fuel the Future,” Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2008, pp. 421-429. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.001
[15]	I. Obernberger, T. Brunner and G. Barnthaler, “Chemical Properties of Solid Biofuels—Significance and Impact,” Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 30, No. 11, 2006, pp. 973-982. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.06.011
[16]	I. Lewandowski and A. Kicherer, “Combustion Quality of Biomass: Practical Relevance and Experiments to Modify the Biomass Quality of Miscanthus giganteus,” European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 1997, pp. 163-177. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02044-8,
[17]	M. Pauly and K. Keegstra, “Cell-Wall Carbohydrates and Their Modification as a Resource for Biofuels,” The Plant Journal, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2008, pp. 559-568. doi:10.1111%2fj.1365-313X.2008.03463.x
[18]	B. Toussaint, G. Excoffier and M. R. Vignon, “Effect of Steam Explosion Treatment on the Physio-Chemical Characteristics and Enzyme Hydrolysis of Poplar Cell Wall Components,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 1-3, 1991, pp. 235-242. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(91)90028-Q,
[19]	C. Cara, E. Ruiz, M. Ballesteros, P. Manzanares, M. J. Negro and E. Castro, “Production of Fuel Ethanol from Steam-Explosion Pretreated Olive Tree Pruning,” Fuel, Vol. 87, No. 6, 2008, pp. 692-700. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.008
[20]	L. H. Zhang, D. Li, L. J. Wang, T. P. Wang, L. Zhang, X. D. Chen and Z. H. Mao, “Effect of Steam Explosion on Biodegradation of Lignin in Wheat Straw,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, No. 17, 2008, pp. 8512-8515. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.028
[21]	A. T. W. M. Hendriks and G. Zeeman, “Pretreatments to Enhance the Digestibility of Lignocellulosic Biomass,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, No. 1, 2009, pp. 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027