Conventional Sugarcane Breeding in South Africa: Progress and Future Prospects

Abstract

Initial sugarcane production in South Africa relied on imported varieties. When imported varieties succumbed to diseases, the industry established the South African Research Institute (SASRI) with the mandate to develop sugarcane varieties. The popular and highly successful varieties, NCo310 and NCo376 were selected from crosses imported from India. NCo310 and NCo376 were grown successfully in several countries across the world where they produced high yield and ratooning ability. Later, crossing was established at SASRI based on flowers initiated in the glasshouse and photoperiod house under controlled temperature and photoperiod conditions. A five stage program is currently being implemented in the variety development process. More than 60 varieties have been released from the breeding programs. Other achievements include development of germplasm that is currently being used to enhance sugar cane variety development in South Africa. Currently, high realised selection gains are evident in most of the advanced selection populations. The released varieties show genetic gains over time. Efforts to enhance the breeding program include introgression, family evaluation, selection models and use of molecular markers.

Share and Cite:

M. Zhou, "Conventional Sugarcane Breeding in South Africa: Progress and Future Prospects," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2013, pp. 189-197. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.42025.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] K. J. Nuss, “Plant Breeding, Crossing and Selection Programmes,” South African Sugarcane Research Institute Durban, 2005.
[2] M. M. Zhou, “Sugarcane Selection: 1976-1996: Results and Procedures Used over Twenty Years of Sugarcane Selection,” Information Bulletin Number 1/96, Zimbabwe Sugar Association Experiment Station, Chiredzi, 1996.
[3] P. G. C. Brett, “A Possible Method for Increasing Pollen Fertility of Sugarcane in Natal,” Report of 45th Annual Meeting of the South African Association for the Advancement of Science, Oudtshoorn, 30 June-4 July 1947.
[4] K. J. Nuss, “The Contribution of Variety NCo376 to Sugar Production in South Africa from 1955 to 2000 and Its Value as a Parent in the Breeding Programme,” Proceeding of the South African Sugarcane Technology Association, Vol. 75, 2001, pp. 154-158.
[5] P. G. C. Brett, “Flowering and Pollen Fertility in Relation to Sugarcane Breeding in Natal,” Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 7, 1951, pp. 43-56.
[6] R. S. Bond, “Variety of the Future,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 69, 1995, pp. 225-226.
[7] M. K. Butterfield, “Plant Breeding Strategies for the Future,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 69, 1995, pp. 219-220.
[8] M. K. Butterfield and K. J. Nuss, “Prospects for New Varieties in the Medium to Long Term: The Effects of Current and Future Breeding Strategy on Variety Characteristics,” South African Sugar Industry Agronomists Association, Kwa-Shukela, 2002, pp. 41-48.
[9] B. M. Shoonees-Muir, M. A. Ronaldson, G. Naidoo and P. M. Schorn, “SASTA Laboratory Manual Including the Official Methods,” South African Sugarcane Technologists Association Publication, Durban, 2009.
[10] SAS, “SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.2,” SAS Institute, Cary, 2009.
[11] K. J. Nuss and P. G. C. Brett, “The Release of Variety NCo310 in 1945 and Its Impact on the Sugar Industry,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 69, 1995, pp. 1-8.
[12] P. A. Donovan, “An Empirical Evaluation of the Sugarcane Variety NCo310,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 70, 1996, pp. 93-102.
[13] S. C. Shih and P. Y. Juang, “The Role of NCo310 in Sugarcane Breeding in Taiwan,” Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 15, 1974 pp. 82-88.
[14] J. Matherne, “A History of Major Sugarcane Varieties,” Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 13, 1969, pp. 1061-1069.
[15] N. Rozeff, “Saying Goodbye to an Old Friend,” Sugar Journal, Vol. 49, 1986, p. 24.
[16] M. M. Zhou, “Performance of Varieties N14 and NCo376 in the South East Lowveld of Zimbabwe,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 78, 2004, pp. 153-160.
[17] D. P. Viator and M. T. Henderson, “Genetic Behaviour of Resistance in Sugarcane to the Sugarcane Borer Diatrea saccharalis (F)”, Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 13, 1971, pp. 276-285.
[18] R. Ming, P. H. Moore and K. K. Wu, “Sugarcane Improvement through Breeding and Biotechnology,” Plant Breeding Review, Vol. 27, 2006, pp. 115-118.
[19] D. M. Hogarth, M. J. Braithwaite and J. C. Skinner, “Selection of Sugarcane Families in the Burdekin District,” Proceedings of the Australia Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 12, 1990, pp. 99-104
[20] C. A. Kimbeng, T. A. McRae and M. C. Cox, “Optimizing Early Generation Selection in Sugarcane Breeding,” Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 24, 2001, pp. 488-493.
[21] M. G. Balzarini, “Biometrical Models for Predicting Future Performance in Plant Breeding,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2000.
[22] D. M. Hogarth and N. Berding, “Breeding for a Better Industry: Conventional Breeding,” Sugarcane International, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2006, pp. 26-31
[23] M. M. Zhou, W. Forester, B. Khomo, J. Kupen, L. Nzimande, P. Nkwanyana and A. Walton, “Using Logistic Regression Model to Aid Selection in Non-Replicated Plots in Sugarcane,” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association, Vol. 85, 2012, pp 241-245.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.