Bryophyte mass to stem length ratio: A potential metric for eco-physiological response to land use

Jason A. Hubbart, Elliott Kellner

Department of Forestry and Department of Soils, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Department of Forestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/oje.2013.31001                

Abstract

Methods of analysis are needed that quantitatively characterize the response of organisms to anthropogenic disturbance. Herein a method is presented that characterizes bryophyte morphological variability in response to timber harvest treatments (clearcut and partial cut). Samples (n = 6196) of the semi-aquatic bryophyte Brachythecium frigidum were collected from clearcut, partial cut and full forest stream reaches between August 2003 and October 2005 and analyzed to obtain mass to stem length ratios (M:SL). Results show that relative to a full forest (i.e. full canopy cover condition), average M:SL ratios were reduced approximately 18% in the partial cut and 37% in the clearcut, indicating a decrease in biomass per unit stem length with increasing harvest intensities. Increased light intensities and higher air temperatures resulting from decreased canopy cover in the harvest treatments corresponded to lower M:SL ratios (0.31 and 0.24 for the partial cut and clearcut, respectively). Results quantify the morphological response of B. frigidum to habitat perturbation, thereby validating the method as a useful assessment of anthropogenic disturbance in post-timber harvest environments. Additional work should be conducted to test the method in other physiographic regions and to isolate bryophyte response to alterations of distinct environmental variables.

Keywords

Semi Aquatic Bryophytes; Timber Harvest; Microclimate; Morphological Growth Response

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Stream Bryophyte Group (1999) Roles of bryophytes in stream ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 18, 151-184. doi:10.2307/1468459
[2]	Fenton, N.J., Frego, K.A. and Sims, M.R. (2003) Changes in forest floor bryophyte (moss and liverwort) communities 4 years after forest harvest. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81, 714-731. doi:10.1139/b03-063
[3]	Nelson, C.R. and Halpern, C.B. (2005) Short-term effects of timber harvest and forest edges on ground-layer mosses and liverworts. Canadian Journal of Botany, 83, 610-620. doi:10.1139/b05-036
[4]	Perhans, K., Appelgren, L., Jonsson, F., Nordin, U., Soderstrom, B. and Gustafsson, L. (2009) Retention patches as potential refugia for bryophytes and lichens in managed forest landscapes. Biological Conservation, 142, 1125-1133. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.033
[5]	Hardman, A. and McCune, B. (2010) Bryoid layer response to soil disturbance by fuel reduction treatments in a dry conifer forest. The Bryologist, 113, 235-245. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-113.2.235
[6]	Root, H.T. and McCune, B. (2010) Forest floor lichen and bryophyte communities in thinned Pseudotsuga menziesii-Tsuga heterophylla forests. The Bryologist, 113, 619-630. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-113.3.619
[7]	Cenci, R.M. (2000) The use of aquatic moss (Fontinalis antipyretica) as monitor of contamination in standing and running waters: Limits and advantages. Journal of Limnology, 60, 53-61.
[8]	Gignac, D. (2001) Bryophytes as indicators of climate change. The Bryologist, 104, 410-420. doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0410:BAIOCC]2.0.CO;2
[9]	Turetsky, M.R. (2003) The role of bryophytes in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The Bryologist, 106, 395-409. doi:10.1639/05
[10]	Binkley, D. and Graham, R.L. (1981) Biomass, production, and nutrient cycling of mosses in an old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Ecology, 62, 1387-1389. doi:10.2307/1937301
[11]	Tiedemann, A.R., Quigley, T.M. and Anderson, T.D. (1988) Effects of timber harvest on stream chemistry and dissolved nutrient losses in northeast Oregon. Forest Science, 34, 344-358.
[12]	Hutchens, J.J. Jr., Batzer, D.P. and Reese, E. (2004) Bioassessment of silvicultural impacts in streams and wetlands of the eastern United States. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus, 4, 37-53. doi:10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012827.95431.b8
[13]	Gravelle, J.A. and Link, T.E. (2007) Influence of timber harvesting on headwater peak stream temperatures in a northern Idaho watershed. Forest Science, 53, 189-205.
[14]	Hubbart, J.A., Link, T.E., Gravelle, J.A. and Elliot, W.J. (2007) Timber harvest impacts on hydrologic yield in the continental/maritime hydroclimatic region of the US. Special Issue on Headwater Forest Streams, Forest Science, 53, 169-180.
[15]	Karwan, D.L., Gravelle, J.A. and Hubbart, J.A. (2007) Effects of timber harvest on suspended sediment loads in Mica Creek, Idaho. Forest Science, 53, 181-188.
[16]	Dynesius, M., Astrom, M. and Nilsson, C. (2008) Microclimatic buffering by logging residues and forest edges reduces clear-cutting impacts on forest bryophytes. Applied Vegetation Science, 11, 345-354. doi:10.3170/2008-7-18457
[17]	Gravelle, J. A., Ice, G., Link, T. E. and Cook, D.L. (2009) Nutrient concentration dynamics in an inland Pacific Northwest watershed before and after timber harvest. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1663-1675. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.017
[18]	Caners, R.T., MacDonald, S.E. and Belland, R.J. (2010) Responses of boreal epiphytic bryophytes to different levels of partial canopy harvest. Botany, 88, 315-328. doi:10.1139/B09-089
[19]	Dovciak, M., Halpern, C.B., Evans, S.A. and Heithecker, T.D. (2010) Forest management changes microclimate and bryophyte communities in the Cascade Mountains of western Washington. The 95th ESA Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, 1-6 August 2010.
[20]	Stehn, S.E., Webster, C.R., Glime, J.M. and Jenkins, M.A. (2010) Elevational gradients of bryophyte diversity, life forms, and community assemblage in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 2164-2174. doi:10.1139/X10-156
[21]	Baldwin, L.K., Petersen, C.L., Bradfield, G.E., Jones, W.M., Black, S.T. and Karakatsoulis, J. (2012) Bryophyte response to forest canopy treatments within the riparian zone of high-elevation small streams. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42, 141-156. doi:10.1139/x11-165
[22]	Sollows, M.C., Frego, K.A. and Norfolk, C. (2001) Recovery of Bazzania trilobata following dessication. The Bryologist, 104, 421-429. doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0421:ROBTFD]2.0.CO;2
[23]	Dynesius, M. and Hylander, K. (2007) Resilience to bryophyte communities to clear-cutting of boreal stream-side forests. Biological Conservation, 135, 423-434. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.010
[24]	Wozniewski, R. and Diekmann, M. (2009) Bryophyte vegetation on decaying spruce logs in wind throws. Forstarchiv, 80, 173-180.
[25]	Arseneault, J., Fenton, N.J. and Bergeron, Y. (2012) Effects of variable canopy retention harvest on epixylic bryophytes in boreal black spruce—Feathermoss forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42, 1467-1476. doi:10.1139/x2012-054
[26]	Shields, J.M., Webster, C.R. and Glime, J.M. (2007) Bryophyte community response to silvicultural opening size in a managed northern hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 252, 222–229. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.048
[27]	McGee, G.G. and Kimmerer, R.W. (2002) Forest age and management effects on epiphytic bryophyte communities in Adirondack northern hardwood forests, New York, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 1562-1576. doi:10.1139/x02-083
[28]	Cleavitt, N.L., Eschtruth, A.K., Battles, J.J. and Fahey, T.J. (2008) Bryophyte response to eastern hemlock decline caused by hemlock woolly adelgid infestation. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 135, 12-25. doi:10.3159/07-RA-030.1
[29]	Mathieson, K. and Frego, K. (2008) Bryophyte-substrate associations and relationships to forest management responses in the Acadian Forest of southern New Brunswick. Eastern CANUSA Forest Science Conference Proceedings, Orono, 17-18 October 2008.
[30]	Witkowski, A. D. and Frego, K.A. (2008) The response of bryophytes to pre-commercial thinning in the Acadian Forest. Eastern CANUSA Forest Science Conference Proceedings, Orono, 17-18 October 2008.
[31]	Dynesius, M., Hylander, K. and Nilsson, C. (2009) High resilience of bryophyte assemblages in streamside compared to upland forests. Ecology, 90, 1042-1054. doi:10.1890/07-1822.1
[32]	Hudson, J.M.G. and Henry, G.H.R. (2009) Increased plant biomass in a High Arctic heath community from 1981 to 2008. Ecology, 90, 2657-2663. doi:10.1890/09-0102.1
[33]	Lang, S.I., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Shaver, G.R., Ahrens, M., Callaghan, T.V., Molau, U., Ter Braak, C.J.F., Holzer, A. and Aerts, R. (2012) Arctic warming on two continents has consistent negative effects on lichen diversity and mixed effects on bryophyte diversity. Global Change Biology, 18, 1096-1107. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02570.x
[34]	Hudson, J.M.G. and Henry, G.H.R. (2010) High Arctic plant community resists 15 years of experimental warming. Journal of Ecology, 98, 1035-1041. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01690.x
[35]	Arroniz-Crespo, M., Gwynn-Jones, D., Callaghan, T.V., Nunez-Olivera, E., Mart?nez-Abaigar, J., Horton, P. and Phoenix, G. K. (2011) Impacts of long-term enhanced UV-B radiation on bryophytes in two sub-Arctic heathland sites of contrasting water availability. Annals of Botany, 108, 557-565. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr178
[36]	Bjerke, J.W., Bokhorst, S., Zielke, M., Callaghan, T.V., Bowles, F.W. and Phoenix, G.K. (2011) Contrasting sensitivity to extreme winter warming events of dominant sub-Arctic heathland bryophyte and lichen species. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1481-1488. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01859.x
[37]	Arroniz-Crespo, M., Leake, J.R., Horton, P. and Phoenix, G.K. (2008) Bryophyte physiological responses to, and recovery from, long-term nitrogen deposition and phosphorus fertilisation in acidic grassland. New Phytologist, 180, 864-874. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02617.x
[38]	Bu, Z.J., Rydin, H. and Chen, X. (2011) Direct and interaction-mediated effects of environmental changes on peatland bryophytes. Oecologia, 166, 555-563. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1880-1
[39]	Hubbart, J.A., Link, T. and Elliot, W.J. (2011) Implementation Strategies to Improve WEPP Snowmelt Simulations in Mountainous Terrain. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 54, 1333-1345.
[40]	Idaho Department of Lands (IDL) (2000) Forest practices cumulative watershed effects process for Idaho. Idaho Department of Lands, Boise.
[41]	White, J.D., Running, S.W., Nemani, R., Keane, R.E. and Ryan, K.C. (1997) Measurement and remote sensing of LAI in Rocky Mountain montane ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 1714-1727. doi:10.1139/x97-142
[42]	Keane, R.E., Reinhardt, E.D., Scott, J., Gray, K. and Reardon, J. (2005) Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 724-739. doi:10.1139/x04-213
[43]	Marshall, J.D. and Waring, R.H. (1986) Comparison of methods of estimating leaf-area index in old-growth Douglas-fir. Ecology, 64, 975-979. doi:10.2307/1939820
[44]	Duursma, R.A., Marshall, J.D. and Robinson, A.P. (2003) Leaf area index inferred from solar beam transmission in mixed conifer forests on complex terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118, 221-236. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00109-6
[45]	Hubbart, J.A., Link, T.E., Campbell, C. and Cobos, D. (2005) An evaluation of a low-cost air temperature measurement system. Hydrological Processes, 19, 1517-1523. doi:10.1002/hyp.5861
[46]	Hubbart, J.A. (2011) An inexpensive alternative solar radiation shield for ambient air temperature micro-sensors. Journal of Natural and Environmental Sciences, 2, 9-14.
[47]	Jonsson, B.G. (1996) Riparian bryophytes of the H.J. Andrews experimental forest in the western Cascades, Oregon. The Bryologist, 99, 226-235. doi:10.2307/3244554
[48]	Conrad, H.S. and Redfearn P.L. (1979) How to know the mosses and liverworts. Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers, New York.
[49]	Dhindsa, R.S. and Matowe, W. (1981) Drought tolerance in 2 mosses correlated with enzymatic defense against lipid per oxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32, 79-92. doi:10.1093/jxb/32.1.79
[50]	Martinez-Abaigar, J., Nunez-Olivera, E. and Beaucourt, N. (2002) Moss communities in the irrigation channels of the river Iregua basin (La Rioja, northern Spain). Cryptogamie Bryologie, 23, 97-117.
[51]	Jonsson, K.I. (2003) Population density and species composition of moss-loving tardigrades in a boreo-nemoral forest. Ecography, 26, 356-364. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03458.x
[52]	Vargha, B., Otvos, E. and Tuba, Z. (2002) Investigations on ecological effects of heavy metal pollution in Hungary by moss-dwelling water bears (Tardigrada), as bioindicators. Annals of Agriculture and Environmental Medicine, 9, 141-146.
[53]	Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry: The princeples and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York.
[54]	Zar J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[55]	Hubbart, J.A., Kavanagh, K.L., Pangle, R., Link, T.E. and Schotzko, A. (2007) Cold air drainage and modeled nocturnal leaf water potential in complex forested terrain. Tree Physiology, 27, 631-639. doi:10.1093/treephys/27.4.631
[56]	Furness, S.B. and Grime, J.P. (1982) Growth rate and temperature responses in bryophytes: I. An investigation of Brachythecium Rutabulum. The Journal of Ecology, 70, 513-523. doi:10.2307/2259919
[57]	Furness, S.B. and Grime, J.P. (1982) Growth rate and temperature responses in bryophytes: II. A comparative study of species of contrasted ecology. The Journal of Ecology, 70, 525-536. doi:10.2307/2259920
[58]	Bonan, G. (2002) Ecological climatology: Concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[59]	Monteith, J.L. (1973) Principles of environmental physics. Edward Arnold Limited, London.
[60]	Koeniger, P., Hubbart, J.A., Link, T. and Marshall, J.D. (2008) Isotopic variation of snow cover and streamflow in response to changes in canopy structure in a snow-dominated mountain catchment. Hydrological Processes, 1-10.