[1]
|
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering,
2024
DOI:10.1007/s11831-023-10055-6
|
|
|
[2]
|
The round shape of a wheel and meta‐analysis – rational review of training of intrapartum fetal monitoring and the importance of its content
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2022
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16893
|
|
|
[3]
|
Extraction of Fetal ECG Using ANFIS and the Undecimated-Wavelet Transform
2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT),
2022
DOI:10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9972078
|
|
|
[4]
|
Extraction of Fetal ECG Using ANFIS and the Undecimated-Wavelet Transform
2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT),
2022
DOI:10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9972078
|
|
|
[5]
|
The round shape of a wheel and meta‐analysis – rational review of training of intrapartum fetal monitoring and the importance of its content
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2022
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16893
|
|
|
[6]
|
Enigma of maternity service safety improvements and increasing expression of patient dissatisfaction
British Journal of Midwifery,
2021
DOI:10.12968/bjom.2021.29.4.194
|
|
|
[7]
|
A Review of Signal Processing Techniques for Non-Invasive Fetal Electrocardiography
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering,
2020
DOI:10.1109/RBME.2019.2938061
|
|
|
[8]
|
Deep Learning for Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Labor
2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC),
2018
DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513625
|
|
|
[9]
|
Re: Time to optimise and enforce training in interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograph
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2017
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14402
|
|
|
[10]
|
International consensus on intrapartum cardiotocography should be underpinned by sound scientific foundation*
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine,
2017
DOI:10.1080/14767058.2016.1247801
|
|
|
[11]
|
Re: Time to optimise and enforce training in interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograph
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2017
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14402
|
|
|
[12]
|
Amendments in electronic fetal monitoring and intermittent auscultation
British Journal of Midwifery,
2016
DOI:10.12968/bjom.2016.24.9.665
|
|
|
[13]
|
The shifting sands of medico-legal intra-partum Ctg (I-P Ctg) monitoring
Medico-Legal Journal,
2016
DOI:10.1177/0025817215593895
|
|
|
[14]
|
Neurological Fallacies Leading to Malpractice
Neurologic Clinics,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.ncl.2016.04.011
|
|
|
[15]
|
Re: Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2015
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13174
|
|
|
[16]
|
Re: Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2015
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13174
|
|
|
[17]
|
Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate patterns and correlation with fetal acidaemia
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2014
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13039
|
|
|
[18]
|
Authors' reply: Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate patterns and correlation with fetal acidaemia
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2014
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13040
|
|
|
[19]
|
Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate patterns and correlation with fetal acidaemia
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2014
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13039
|
|
|
[20]
|
Authors' reply: Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate patterns and correlation with fetal acidaemia
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
2014
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13040
|
|
|
[21]
|
Are ‘early’ and ‘late’ fetal heart rate decelerations extinct? A survey of British midwives and analysis of controversies, facts and fiction
British Journal of Midwifery,
2013
DOI:10.12968/bjom.2013.21.12.860
|
|
|