[1]
|
Abric, J. (1984). A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of SR in a s situation of interaction. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds), Social Representations (pp.169-184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[2]
|
Abric, J. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp.42-47). England: Blackwell.
|
[3]
|
Allansdottir, A., Jovchelovitch, S., & Stathopoulou, A. (1993). Social Representations: The versatility of a concept. Papers on social representations, 2, 3-10.
|
[4]
|
Billig, M. (1991). Ideologies and beliefs. London, England: Sage.
|
[5]
|
Breakwell, G. (1993). Social Representations and Social Identity. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 1-20.
|
[6]
|
Castro, P., & Gomes, I. (2005). Genetically modified organisms in the Portuguese press: Thematization and anchoring. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35, 1-17.
|
[7]
|
Cavazza, N. (2005). Atteggiamenti, rappresentazioni sociali e cambiamento: il ruolo della comunicazione, in G. Sarchielli e B. Zani (a cura di), Persone, gruppi e comunità. Scritti di psicologia sociale in onore di Augusto Palmonari (pp.163-182). Bologna, Emilia- Romagna: Il Mulino.
|
[8]
|
Cialdini, R. (1984). Influence. The Psychology of Persuasion. New York, NY: William Morrow e Company.
|
[9]
|
Cortini, M., & Manuti, A. (2002). Il marketing politico sul web: Strategie discorsive di autopresentazione dei partiti politici italiani. In (a cura di) G. Mininni. Virtuale.com: la parola spiazzata (pp.123-155). Napoli, Campania: Idelson Gnocchi.
|
[10]
|
Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffenson, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written in American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71.
|
[11]
|
Doise, W. (1984). Social representations, intergroup experiments and levels of analysis. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp.255-268). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[12]
|
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Social representations and the development of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[13]
|
Duveen, G. (1998). The Psychosocial Production of Ideas: Social Representations and Psychologic. Culture & Psychology, 4, 455-472.
|
[14]
|
Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions. (pp. 257-270). Malden Blackwell Publishing.
|
[15]
|
Duveen, G. (2007) Culture and social representations. In J.Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology. (pp. 543-559). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
|
[16]
|
Greimas, A., & Courtés, J. (1979). Dictionnaire raisonnée de Semio- tique. Paris: Dunot.
|
[17]
|
Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London, England: Sage.
|
[18]
|
Horwarth, C., Foster, J., & Dorrer, N. (2004). Exploring the potential of the theory of social representations in community based health research and viceversa. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 229-243.
|
[19]
|
Houtilainen, A., & Tourila, H. (2005). Social representation of new food has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust. Food and Quality Preference, 16: 565-572.
|
[20]
|
Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on “social representations”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 195-209.
|
[21]
|
Jovchelovitch, S. (2002). Rethinking the diversity of knowledge. Cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation. Psychologie et Société, 5, 121-138.
|
[22]
|
Lazlo, J. (1997). Narrative Organization of Social Representations, Papers on Social Representations, 6, 155-172.
|
[23]
|
Lloyd, B., & Duveen, G. (1990). A semiotic analysis of the development of social representations of gender. In G.Duveen & B.Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 27-46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[24]
|
Liu, L. (2004). Sensitising concept, Themata and Shareness: a dialogical perspective of Social Representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34, 249-264.
|
[25]
|
Lotman, J. (1985). La semiosfera. L’asimmetria ed il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti. Venezia: Marsilio.
|
[26]
|
Manuti, A. (2005). The rhetoric of work flexibility: a diatextual frame of Italian political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 4, 371-396.
|
[27]
|
Markova, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social Representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6, 419-460.
|
[28]
|
Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicity and social representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[29]
|
Mc Combs, M. E., Shaw, D.L., & Weaver, D. (1997). Communication and Democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
[30]
|
Mc Combs, M.E., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
|
[31]
|
Mininni, G. (1995). Discorsiva mente. Profilo di psicosemiotica. Napoli, Campania : Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
|
[32]
|
Mininni, G. (2004). Psicologia e media. Bari, BA: Laterza.
|
[33]
|
Mininni, G. (2003). Il discorso come forma di vita. Napoli, Campania: Guida.
|
[34]
|
Mininni, G. (2005). Diatexts as a mirror of human complexity. World Futures, 61, 163-175.
|
[35]
|
Moloney, G., Hall, R., & Walker, I., (2005). Social Representations and Themata: The construction and functioning of social knowledge about donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology. 44 , 415-441.
|
[36]
|
Moloney, G., & Walker, I. (2000). Messiahs, Pariahs, Donors: The development of Social Representations of Organ Transplants. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 30, 203-227.
|
[37]
|
Morgan, S., Harrison, T., Long, S., Afifi, W., Stephenson, M., & Reichert, T. (2005). Family discussions about organ donation: how the media influences opinions about donation decisions. Clinical Transplantation, 19, 674-682.
|
[38]
|
Moscovici, S. (1961) La psychoanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaire.
|
[39]
|
Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreword. In C. Herzlich (Ed.), Health and Illness: A social analysis (pp. IX-XIV). London, England: Academic Press.
|
[40]
|
Moscovici, S., (1981). On social representations. Perspectives on everyday understanding. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition (pp. 181-209). London, England: Academic Press.
|
[41]
|
Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representation, In R.Farr, & S.Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[42]
|
Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of Social Representations? In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp.8-35). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
|
[43]
|
Moscovici, S., & Vignaux, G. (2000). The concept of Themata. In K. Duveen (Ed.) Social Representations. Explorations in Social Psychology (pp. 156-183). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
|
[44]
|
Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
[45]
|
Potter, J., & Litton, I. (1985). Problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 81-90.
|
[46]
|
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, England: Sage.
|
[47]
|
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1999). Social Representations and Discursive Psychology: From cognition to action. Culture & Psychology, 5, 447-458.
|
[48]
|
Raudsepp, M. (2005). Why is it so difficult to understand the theory of social representations? Culture & Psychology, 11 , 455-468.
|
[49]
|
Rose, D., Efraim, D., Gervais, M., Joffe, H., Jovchelovitch, S., & Morant, N. (1995). Questioning consensus in social representation theory. Papers in social representations, 4, 150-176.
|
[50]
|
Sen, R., & Wagner, W. (2009). Cultural mechanics of fundamentalism: Religion as ideology, divided identities and violence in post-Gandhi India. Culture & Psychology, 15, 299-326.
|
[51]
|
Spaemann R. (1996). Personen. Versuche uber den Unbterschiede zwischen “etwas” und “jemand”, Stuttgart: Nachfolger GmbH (tr. it. di L. Allodi, Persone. Sulla differenza tra “qualcosa” e “qualcuno” ), Roma-Bari 2005: Laterza.
|
[52]
|
Spink , M. (1993). Qualitative research on social representations: the delightful world of paradoxes. Papers on Social Representations, 2 , 48-54.
|
[53]
|
Van Dijk, & T., A. (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
|
[54]
|
Van Dijk, & T., A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse & Society, 4 , 249-283.
|
[55]
|
Van Dijk, & T., A. (1997). Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage.
|
[56]
|
Voelklein, C., & Howarth C. (2005). A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate, Culture & Psychology, 11, 431-454.
|
[57]
|
Volli, U. (2005). Laboratorio di semiotica, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
|
[58]
|
Wagner, W. (1995). Description, explanation and method in Social Representation research, Papers on Social Representations, 4, 1-21.
|
[59]
|
Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond: brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4, 297-329.
|
[60]
|
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi Cioldi, F., Markova, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and Method of Social Representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 95-125.
|
[61]
|
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (2000). I have some faith and at the same time I don’t believe. Cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 301-314.
|