[1]
|
Andrich, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365.
|
[2]
|
Andrich, D., & Styles, I. (1998). The structural relationship between attitudes and behavior statements from the unfolding perspective. Psychological Methods, 3, 454-469. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.454
|
[3]
|
Barnette, J. J. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 361-370.
doi:10.1177/00131640021970592
|
[4]
|
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1989). Research in education (6th Edition). Englewoods Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
|
[5]
|
Bourque, L. B., & Fielder, E. P. (1995). How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys. London: Sage.
|
[6]
|
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
|
[7]
|
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
|
[8]
|
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Slaih, F. A. (1987). Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 93- 103. doi:10.1177/014662168701100107
|
[9]
|
Ferguson, L. (1941). A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 51-57.
doi:10.1080/00224545.1941.9714060
|
[10]
|
Fink, A. (1995). The Survey Handbook. London: Sage.
|
[11]
|
Fowler, F. J. Jr. (1995). Improving Survey Questions. London: Sage.
|
[12]
|
Henerson, M. E. Morris, L. L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). How to measure attitudes. London: Sage.
|
[13]
|
Herche, J., & Engelland, B. (1996). Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 366-374. doi:10.1177/0092070396244007
|
[14]
|
Leedy, P. D. (1997). Practical research: Planning and design (6th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
|
[15]
|
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140.
|
[16]
|
Mangione, T. W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. London: Sage.
|
[17]
|
Millman, J., & Greene, J. (1989). The specifications and development of tests of achievement and ability. In: R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd Edition). Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education.
|
[18]
|
Roberts, J., Laughlin, J., & Wedell, D. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 59, 211-233.
doi:10.1177/00131649921969811
|
[19]
|
Schmitt, N., & Stuits, D. M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 367-373.
doi:10.1177/014662168500900405
|
[20]
|
Seiler, L., & Hough, R. (1970). Empirical comparisons of the Thurstone and Likert techniques. In: G. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measurement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
|
[21]
|
Shuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Sage.
|
[22]
|
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554. doi:10.1086/214483
|
[23]
|
Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 72-91. doi:10.1086/374697
|