[1]
|
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715-729.
doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715
|
[2]
|
Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
|
[3]
|
Boswell, A. A., & Spade, J. Z. (1996). Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women? Gender and Society, 10, 133-147. doi:10.1177/089124396010002003
|
[4]
|
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate Preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992
|
[5]
|
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
|
[6]
|
Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19-31.
doi:10.1080/00224499809551914
|
[7]
|
Crawford, C. B., & Anderson, J. L. (1989). Sociobiology: An environmentalist discipline? American Psychologist, 44, 1449-1459.
doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1449
|
[8]
|
Costanzo, P. R., & Shaw, M. E. (1966). Conformity as a function of age level. Child Development, 37, 967-975. doi:10.2307/1126618
|
[9]
|
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
|
[10]
|
Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M., Asadorian, J., D’Aureli, N., Hall, A., Gigliotti, S., Michener, E., & Wheeler, E. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among University students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139-157.
doi:10.1177/0886260506295354
|
[11]
|
Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulation sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory Psychology, 11, 209-232. doi:10.1177/0959354301112004
|
[12]
|
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
|
[13]
|
Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 192-208.
|
[14]
|
Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right. New York: Institute for American Values.
|
[15]
|
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606. doi:10.1086/222355
|
[16]
|
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951
|
[17]
|
Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129-133.
doi:10.1080/00224490309552174
|
[18]
|
LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G. (1980). Living the sexual script: College students views of influence in sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 16, 338-355.
doi:10.1080/00224498009551090
|
[19]
|
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435-446.
doi:10.1080/00224499209551658
|
[20]
|
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491-497.
|