Fabrication of Silicon/Carbon Composite Material with Silicon Waste and Carbon Nanofiber Applied in Lithium-Ion Battery ()
1. Introduction
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in our daily life, including portable electronic devices, electric vehicles, and even grid energy storage [1] [2]. However, the manufacturing process and raw materials production also consume energy and raise environmental issues. Thus, recycling and reusing the materials from society is key to protecting our environment [3]. As a result, applying waste silicon recycled from industries such as the photovoltaic (PV) industry in LIBs is of great significance.
To achieve the demand of higher energy density and power density for electric vehicles, silicon (Si) based materials are the most potential candidate for the high theoretical capacity (~4200 mAh/g), which is about 11 times higher than the conventional graphite capacity (372 mAh/g) [4] [5]. Nevertheless, Si faces a severe volume change of about 300% during charging and discharging process, leading to the pulverization of active material and delamination from the current collector. Thus, Si-based materials suffer from the structural degradation and formation of the unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), resulting in rapid capacity decay [6] [7] [8].
To reduce the structural destruction and improve the electrochemical performance of Si-based materials, much research shows that composite designs are effective strategies to offer buffer space for alleviating the volume expansion of Si during lithiation and delithiation process, such as Si/C design [9] [10] and surface modification [11] [12]. Carbon nanofiber (CNF), with great mechanical properties, good conductivity, and large surface area, has been investigated in many lithium-ion batteries studies [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. The large surface area of CNF can reduce the areal current density and provide more sites for binder to bind electrode material together [17]. Furthermore, both the disordered and graphitic structures of CNF act as active sites for lithium ions transport. CNF can also be a buffer matrix to accommodate the serious volume change of Si during charging/discharging process, preventing the destruction of the electronic pathway [13] [15]. These characteristics are expected to enhance the electrochemical performances of waste Si for commercial application in lithium-ion batteries.
In this study, Si-CNF composite was synthesized by two steps, including freeze-drying method and calcination. The CNF was fabricated from rice crops through a series of chemical treatments. Through the freeze-drying method, Si-CNF composite formed a uniform structure, promoting the attachment of CNF and waste Si particles and improving the electrochemical performances.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Materials Synthesis
The raw material of Si was from the slicing waste in PV industry. The HPM solution was used to clean the raw Si powders at 120˚C for 3 hours. Then Si powder was collected by vacuum suction filter and washed 5 times by DI-water. The sample is denoted as Si-bare. After drying, 6 g Si and 2 g PAA were added into 95% ethanol solution, stirred overnight and heated on the hot plate to evaporate the solvent. The mixture was calcinated at 600˚C for 3 hours in Ar/5% H2 with the heating rate at 10˚C∙min−1, and the carbon-coated Si (Si-C) was produced.
CNF was fabricated by a series of chemical treatments. First, rice straw was dewaxed with 5 wt% NaOH solution. Then CH3COOH/H2O2 solution was used for bleaching and removal of metal impurities. Afterward, TEMPO was adopted to oxidize cellulose and NaBr was acted as a protectant. Subsequently, CNF solution was synthesized under 500 W ultra-sonic vibration.
Si-C powder was mixed with 1 wt% and 2 wt% CNF in Di-water for 12 hours. Then the solution was freeze dried for 24 hours and further calcinated at 350˚C for 3 hours in Ar/5% H2 with the heating rate at 10˚C∙min−1, and the Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt composites were obtained.
2.2. Materials Characterization
The crystal structures of the composite were identified by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker D2-phaser, Cu Kα) at 30 kV and 10 mA. The carbon content was measured by thermal gravimetric analysis (STA 449 F1 Jupiter, Netzsch). The morphology was observed by field-emission SEM (JSM-7600F, JEOL). The surface microstructure was observed by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM; JEOL JEM-F200). The surface area was measured by BET surface area analyzers (ASAP 2020 V4.02).
2.3. Electrochemical Characterization
CR2032-type coin cells were used to test electrochemical performance. The anode materials were prepared with 60 wt% active material, 20 wt% carbon black, and 20 wt% Polyacrylic acid (PAA) binder. Slurry containing these three materials in 95 vol% ethanol was blended homogeneously and coated on 20 μm Cu foils, then the electrodes were completely dried under vacuum for 3 h. The coin cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glovebox, where the contents of H2O and O2 were less than 0.1 ppm, containing electrodes, Li-metal, polypropylene separator, and electrolyte composed of 1.0 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC (1:1, vol%).
The electrochemical tests of half cells were performed in the voltage range of 0.01 V and 1.5 V vs. Li/Li+. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were operated using Arbin battery tester. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphology and Material Characterization
To detect the crystal structure of the samples, XRD analysis was measured. Figure 1 reveals the XRD patterns of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt. Si-bare displays high crystallinity without other phases, indicating that the impurity was successfully removed via HPM solution. After calcination at 350˚C, the XRD patterns of Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt still remain the high crystallinity of Si-bare without extra phase formation. Figure 2 shows the Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results of the Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt for the determination
Figure 1. XRD diffraction of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, Si-CNF2wt.
Figure 2. TGA of Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt sintered from 25˚C to 550˚C in air atmosphere.
of carbon content. The temperature was conducted from room temperature up to 600˚C in air. The weight loss of Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt is 2.7% and 4%, respectively.
To further investigate the structure of CNF, Raman spectroscopy was performed (Figure 3). The peaks around 1382 and near 1568 cm−1 were designated as D-band and G-band, respectively. D-band is associated to the defects and disordered carbon, whereas G-band is corresponding to graphitized carbon [18]. The integrated intensity ratio, ID/IG, represents the degree of structural defects, arising from edges and disorder carbon atoms. Thus, the higher ratio is favorable for lithium ion insertion [19] [20]. The value of ID/IG for CNF is 0.65, demonstrating that defects were induced during the pyrolysis of cellulose. Defects in the CNF offer pathways for lithium ions to transport during charging-discharging process, enhancing the diffusivity of lithium ions and conductivity of active materials [21].
Figure 3. Raman patterns of cellulose nanofiber after calcination.
The morphology of materials is shown via SEM and TEM. Figures 4(a)-(c) are SEM images of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt, respectively. From the image of Si-bare, the shape of waste Si was irregular and the size distribution was around 100 nm to 1 μm. In Figure 4(b) and Figure 4(c), CNF was attached on the surface of Si particles. To investigate the surface morphologies of Si-CNF1wt, high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) was performed, and images are shown in Figure 4(d) and Figure 4(e). TEM images display a uniform carbon-coating layer with the thickness around 5 nm on the surface of Si particles. Figure 4(e) shows that CNF was attached to the Si particles, similar to the image shown in Figure 4(b). Further investigation of the surface area was conducted by BET measurement. In Table 1, the surface area of composites and pristine shows 12.16 m2/g, 13.02 m2/g, and 1.64 m2/g for Si-CNF1wt, Si-CNF2wt and Si-bare, respectively, indicating that the micropore surface area of composites are higher than Si-bare. The SEM and TEM results also present that CNF was uniform attached to Si. The increased surface area by CNF may create more sites for binder to connect with active materials and conductive materials, strengthening the structural stability.
3.2. Electrochemical Measurements
Cycling tests at the current density of 0.5 A/g for Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt composites are shown in Figure 5(a). The discharge capacities and coulombic efficiency of first cycle for Si-bare were 2317 mAh/g and 87.5%, respectively. After adding CNF in the materials, the first cycle of discharge capacities for Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt were 3091 mAh/g and 2861 mAh/g. The first cycle of coulombic efficiency for Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt were also increased to 88.4% and 90.4%. After 50 cycles, Si-CNF1wt exhibited a better cycling stability and the capacity remained 1691 mAh/g, while Si-CNF2wt and Si-bare showed 916 mAh/g and 281 mAh/g. The improved cycling performances are attributed to the addition of CNF, creating high surface area for binding network
Figure 4. SEM image of (a) Si-bare, (b) Si-CNF1wt, (c) Si-CNF2wt, and TEM image of (d) (e) Si-CNF1wt.
Figure 5. (a) Cycle performance at 0.5 A/g; (b) C-rate performance.
Table 1. BET surface area of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt.
among active materials, conductive materials and binder. CNF provides a buffer space and acts as a connecting agent to combine electrode materials together. As a result, severe volume change of Si during lithiation and delithiation and the structural destruction of electrode material are mitigated. However, the CNF addition should be controlled in appropriate ratio. Si-CNF2wt composite demonstrates worse retention than Si-CNF1wt. The reason is that the content of PAA binder in the electrode was not enough to capture all the CNF for the over-increased surface area. Consequently, the ratio of CNF ought to be well designed in the material.
Rate performance at different current densities is also used to evaluate anode stability and performance as shown in Figure 5(b). The current density was changed from 0.5, 1, 2, to 0.5 A/g in every 10 cycles in order. The specific capacities of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt were respectively 2136, 2547, and 2694 at the first 10 cycles under 0.5 A/g, 1846, 1664, and 1790 at cycle 10 to 20 under 1 A/g, 861, 1109, and 1188 at cycle 20 to 30 under 2 A/g, and 1495, 1613, and 1400 mAh/g at cycle 30 to 40 under 0.5 A/g. Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt composites demonstrate a superior rate performance than Si-bare at 2 A/g since CNF defects may decrease the transferring energy barrier. Furthermore, Si-CNF1wt exhibited a greater rate performance and lower specific capacity loss than Si-bare and Si-CNF2wt at the second-time 0.5 A/g, indicating that Si-CNF1wt acquires better stability performance after a long cycle and high C-rate test.
Figure 6 is the CV plot at the scan rate of 0.1 mV/s for Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, and Si-CNF2wt among the voltage window of 0.01 - 1.5 V. During the lithiation process, the reduction current increased below 0.2 V in the first sweep cycle in all electrodes. This may be contributed to the transformation of crystalline-Si to poly-crystalline Li22Si5. In the delithiation process of the first cycle, the peaks at 0.36 V and 0.54 V were related to a partial Li-discharge to Li13Si4 and full Li-discharge to amorphous Si (Figure 6(a)) [22] [23]. It is found that the addition of CNF decreased the polarization in the first cycle, attributing to the defects in CNF. For the second cycle (Figure 6(b)), an additional cathodic peak at about 0.21 V for Si-bare and 0.17 V for Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt was corresponding to Li-Si alloy formation [24].
To further exhibit the benefits of the CNF in waste Si, the SEM images before cycling and after 50 cycles for Si-bare and Si-CNF1wt electrodes are displayed in Figure 7. Before cycling, all electrodes showed a smooth surface and similar structure (Figures 7(a)-(c)); nevertheless, the Si-bare electrode was severely pulverized with large cracks up to 10 μm after 50 cycles (Figure 7(d)). In contrast, Si-CNF1wt and Si-CNF2wt retained good integrity with few micro cracks on the surface. Also, the crack formation on Si-CNF1wt electrode (Figure 7(e)) was less than Si-CNF2wt (Figure 7(f)) after 50 cycles. The morphology is consistent with the performances in the cyclic tests and rate performances. Si-CNF1wt reveals a stable structure and CNF prevents the Si particles from pulverization during electrochemical tests.
Figure 6. CV plot of Si-bare, Si-CNF1wt, Si-CNF2wt at the scan rate of 0.1 mV/s. (a) First cycle; (b) Second cycle.
Figure 7. SEM images of electrodes morphologies before cycling (a) Si-bare; (b) Si-CNF1wt; (c) Si-CNF2wt; after 50 cycles; (d) Si-bare; (e) Si-CNF1wt; (f) Si-CNF2wt.
4. Conclusion
This work not only successfully recycled waste silicon from the photovoltaic industry, but also enhanced the electrochemical performance by CNF addition and structural design. Composite of waste silicon and CNF anode was successfully fabricated by freeze-drying method and further calcination. This method provided a uniform dispersion of CNF and Si particles. The composite shows excellent electrochemical performances with stable retention in the cycle test and great rate capability than pristine waste Si. After 50 cycles, Si-CNF1wt remained 1691 mAh/g, while Si-bare only displayed 281 mAh/g. Moreover, Si-CNF1wt also demonstrated a higher capacity (1109 mAh/g) than Si-bare (861 mAh/g) in C-rate test at the current rate of 2 A/g. This indicates that the enhanced performances are attributed to the moderate addition of CNF in waste silicon which increases the surface area of the particles, forming a firm binding network to strengthen the electrode integrity. However, excessive addition of CNF in waste silicon has a limited improvement of the performances, owing to the over-increased surface area, making binder fail to stretch to all the materials. Overall, this study provides green manufacturing of recycling and synthesis for the composite of CNF and waste Si applied in the next-generation lithium-ion battery.
Acknowledgements
Financial supports from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Contract No. MOST 109-2622-E-007-020 and MOST 110-2636-E-007-015 are much appreciated. The authors would also like to thank the technical support from the instrument manager of HRTEM (Ms. Yi-Jen Yu).
Authors’ Contributions
Ying-Yang Li: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing original draft.
Che-Ya Wu: Conceptualization, formal analysis, validation.
Tzu-Ying Lin: Supervision, writing, review & editing.
Jenq-Gong Duh: Project administration, supervision, writing review & editing.