Arsenic Polluted Groundwater and Its Countermeasures in the Middle Basin of the Ganges, Uttar Pradesh State, India

Abstract

The arsenic contamination of groundwater in Uttar Pradesh State was first recognized in 2003 and is now seen at 20 Districts out of 70 Districts. University of Miyazaki has performed the arsenic mitigation project in Bahraich District, severest arsenic-affected one in the 20 Districts, from June 2008 until now, with JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). The integrated mitigation, such as the raising awareness of villager, installing of alternative water supply units and healthcare of arsenocosis patients, have been executed at the 2 villages. The symptom of the arsenocosis patients was not so severe, which will be, therefore, improved by drinking arsenic-safe water supplied through arsenic removal units, installed by this project. In this paper, following results is discussed for the situation and mechanism of arsenic contamination of groundwater, objected in connection with the installation of arsenic removal units: 1) Groundwater is almost contaminated with arsenic in deep tubewell (depth: about 30 m), but scarcely in shallow tubewell (depth: about 10 m); 2) Arsenic contaminated groundwater is under the reduced condition with the oxidized condition for no-arsenic contaminated groundwater; 3) Arsenic concentration shows almost linear correlation with concentrations of Fe2+ and -N; 4) Ground is composed of sand with high arsenic content at around 25 m depth; 5) Arsenic exists mainly in the phase of reducible fraction or weak acid soluble fraction but no oxidizable fraction in the ground.

Share and Cite:

Y. Yano, K. Ito, A. Kodama, K. Shiomori, S. Tomomatsu, M. Sezaki and H. Yokota, "Arsenic Polluted Groundwater and Its Countermeasures in the Middle Basin of the Ganges, Uttar Pradesh State, India," Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 3 No. 8A, 2012, pp. 856-862. doi: 10.4236/jep.2012.328100.

1. Introduction

Arsenic contamination of groundwater, in Asia, is seen in the basins of the great rivers, originating in the Himalayan Mountains and the Tibetan Plateau, such as the Ganges River, the Indus River, the Mekong River, the Haw River, and the Yellow River [1], where people depend on the drinking water for groundwater. A thermally altered metamorphic zone in the Higher Himalaya, containing various types of minerals, is considered as the source of arsenic [2].

Arsenic pollution of groundwater in Ganges River basin, West Bengal, India, and Bangladesh is known for long. The detection of the arsenic pollution is in 1982 and 1993, respectively. The investigations and countermeasures have been performed [3-6].

On the other hand, in Mekong River basin, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, arsenic pollution was first confirmed around 2000 and countermeasures just began under help such as UNICEF and GIST (Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) [7,8].

The authors have elucidated the mechanism for arsenic contamination and developed the safe water devices in Bangladesh since 1997 together with the NGO “Asia Arsenic Network” (AAN) [9]. AAN has implemented the Arsenic Mitigation Project with Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in Bangladesh from 1999 until now. The University of Miyazaki has conducted activities for arsenic mitigation in Uttar Pradesh State, India, under a JICA technical cooperation project from 2008 until now, in collaboration with AAN.

Uttar Pradesh State (abbreviated as UP State hereafter) is located at north of India bordering on Nepal, Geographical area of which is about 4700 km2, where two big rivers are running from the northwest to the southeast. The former is the Ghaghara River flowing down from the arsenic affected Terrai plane, and the latter is the Ganges River as shown in Figure 1. The arsenic contamination in UP State was first recognized in 2003 at Ballia District, where both of the Ghaghara and the Ganges are joining.

(a) (b)

Figure 1. (a) Location of Uttar Pradesh; (b) location of project area, Bahraich district.

Arsenic-contaminated tubewell water is detected in the 20 Districts out of 70 Districts in UP State by UP government under the assistance of UNICEF. The government survey was, however, performed only for the government tubewells (GTWs), and private tubewells (PTWs), numerous compared with GTW, were not checked at all. In regard to arsenocosis patients, the number of patient is unknown yet, because the medical examination has not been executed until now.

Our project area is in Bahraich District (See Figure 1(b)), severely arsenic affected one in the above-mentioned 20 Districts. The project is an integrated arsenic mitigation with 3 activities: 1) Raising awareness of villagers for poison of arsenic through a street play, etc.; 2) Identification of arsenocosis patients after training local medical doctors for diagnosis of chronic arsenic poisoning; 3) Installation of arsenic removal unit after checking all tubewells used in the villages.

Though the groundwater of the Ganges medium basin is contaminated with arsenic, few reports [10-12] are obtained. We will, therefore, introduce the situation and mechanism of arsenic contamination of groundwater, obtained from the 1st phase of JICA arsenic mitigation project (2008-2011) as an interim report.

This paper mainly shows the data obtained in the activity (3) mentioned above.

2. Situations of Arsenic Contamination in UP State

Figure 2 shows the ratio of arsenic polluted GTW (As > 50 ppb) in the 20 Districts obtained from the above mentioned government survey. There are 3 severe con taminated Districts: Kehri, Ballia, and Bahraich. The detection of arsenic contamination in Kehri was right after that in Ballia, and 500 of deep wells were installed in Ballia and

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] H. Yokota, “Arsenic Pollutions of Groundwater in the World and Arsenic Removal Unit Installed in Bangladesh,” Keynote Lecture, Vietnam-Japan Joint Seminar on Geotechnics and Geoenvironment Engineering, Hanoi, November 2004, pp. 226-242.
[2] R. B. Sah, “Studies for Possible Natural Sources of Arsenic Poisoning of Groundwater in Terai Plain of Nepal,” Arsenic Research Committee, Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, 2002.
[3] D. Chakraborty, G. Samanta, et al., “Arsenic in Ground Water in Six districts of West Bengal, India: biggest arsenic calamity in the world,” Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 18, 1996, pp. 5-15.
[4] M. Feroze Ahmed and C. M. Ahmed, “Arsenic Mitigation in Bangladesh,” An Outcome of the International Workshop, Local Government Division, Ministry of LGRD & Co-Operatives, September 2002.
[5] D. Chakraborti, M. K. Sengupta, M. M. Rahman, S. Ahamed, U. K. Chowdhury, M. A. Hossain, et al., “Groundwater Arsenic Contamination and Its Health Effects in the Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra Plain,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, Vol. 6, 2004, pp. 75N-83N.
[6] Ministry of Local Government (Bangladesh) and JICA, “Sustainable Arsenic Mitigation under Integrated Local Government System in Jessore,” Final Report, 2008.
[7] K.-W. Kim, P. Chanpiwat, H. T. Hanh, K. Phan and S. Sthiannopkao, “Arsenic Geochemistry of Groundwater in Southeast Asia,” Frontiers of Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2011, pp. 420-433.
[8] K. H. Cho, S. Sthiannopkao, Y. A. Pachepsky, K.-W. Kim and J. H. Kim, “Prediction of Contamination Potential of Groundwater Arsenic in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand Using Artificial Neural Network,” Water Research, Vol. 45, No. 17, 2011, pp. 5535-5544. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.010
[9] H. Yokota, et al., “Collaboration between NGO and University of Miyazaki and Asian Arsenic Network for the Mitigation of Arsenic Contamination in Ganges Basin,” Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Health Hazards of Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and its Countermeasures, Keynote Lecture, 2006, pp. 47-58.
[10] S. Ahamed, M. Kumar Sengupta, B. Das, B. Nayak, A. Pal, A. Mukherjee, M. Amir Hossain and D. Chakraborti, “Arsenic Groundwater Contamination and Its Health Effects in the State of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in Upper and Middle Ganga Plain, India: A Severe Danger,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 370, No. 2-3, 2006, pp. 310- 322. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.015
[11] A. K. Srivastava and R. M. Tripathi, “Arsenic in Ground Water in Uttar Pradesh: Testing and Mitigation Activities,” Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Health Hazards of Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and its Countermeasures, 2006, pp. 77-82.
[12] Y. Yano, A. Kodama, K. Shiomori, M. Sezaki, K. Tanabe, R. Jaiswal, P. Jaiswal, Tripathi and H. Yokota, “Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater at Uttar Pradesh State in India,” International Symposium on Geo-disaster Prevention and Geo-environment in Asia, JS-Fukuoka, The Japanese Geotechnical Society, 2009, pp. 193-198.
[13] M. Pueyo, J. Sastre, E. Hernandez, M. Vidal, J. F. Lopez- Sanchez and G. Rauret, “Predection of Trace Element Mobility in Contaminated Soils by Sequential Extraction,” Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2003, pp. 2054-2066. doi:10.2134/jeq2003.2054
[14] National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, “Assessment of Generation, Treatment, Disposal and Selection of Disposal Sites for Hazardous Wastes in Kanpur,” Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Luck- now, 1996, pp. 102-112.
[15] J. Akai, K. Izumi, H. Fukuhara, H. Masuda, S. Nakano, T. Yoshimura, H. Ohfuji, Md. Anawar Hossain and K. Akai, “Mineralogical and Geomicrobiological Investigations on Groundwater Arsenic Enrichment in Bangladesh,” Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 215-230. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.008
[16] M. Hussainuzzaman and H. Yokota, “Efficiency of Arsenic Removal Unit working in Bangladesh and Cement Stabilization of Its Sludge,” Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2006, pp. 1-9.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.