[1]
|
Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischhoff, B. (1983). Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1185-1195. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1185
|
[2]
|
Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (1987). The magical number one. In D. R. Moates, & R. Butrick (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ohio University Interdisciplinary Inference conference, Athens, 221-230.
|
[3]
|
Doherty, M. E., Chadwick, R., Garavan, H., Barr, D., & Mynatt, C. R. (1996). On people’s understanding of the diagnostic implications of probabilistic data. Memory and Cognition, 24, 644-654.
doi:10.3758/BF03201089
|
[4]
|
Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R., Tweney, R. D, & Schiavo, M. D. (1979). Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica, 49, 11-21.
|
[5]
|
Doherty, M. E., Schiavo, M. B., Tweney, R. D., & Mynatt C. R. (1981). The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 191-194.
|
[6]
|
Evans, J. St. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Brighton: Erlbaum.
|
[7]
|
Evans, J. St. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 378-395.
doi:10.3758/BF03193858
|
[8]
|
Evans, J. (2009). How many dual-processing theories do we need? One, two, or many? In J. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[9]
|
Evans, J. St., & Over, D. E. (1996). Reasoning and rationality. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
|
[10]
|
Evans, J. St. B. T., Venn, S., & Feeney, A. (2002). Implicit and explicit processes in a hypothesis testing task. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 31-46. doi:10.1348/000712602162436
|
[11]
|
Feeney, A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Clibbens, J. (1997). Probabilities, utilities and hypothesis testing. In M. G. Shafto, & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 217-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
[12]
|
Feeney, A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Clibbens, J. (2000). Background beliefs and evidence interpretation. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 97-124. doi:10.1080/135467800402811
|
[13]
|
Feeney, A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Venn, S. (2000a) A rarity heuristic for hypothesis testing. In: L. R. Gleitman, & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 119-124). Mahawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
[14]
|
Feeney, A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Venn, S. (2000b) The effects of beliefs about the evidence on hypothesis testing. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Durham.
|
[15]
|
Feeney, A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Venn, S. (2008) Rarity, pseudodiagnosticity and Bayesian reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 209-230. doi:10.1080/13546780801934549
|
[16]
|
Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90, 239-260.
doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239
|
[17]
|
Kern, L., & Doherty, M. E. (1982). “Pseudodiagnosticity” in an idealized medical problem-solving environment. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 100-104. doi:10.1097/00001888-198202000-00004
|
[18]
|
Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. In J. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from a cognitive perspective (pp. 365-418). New York: Academic Press.
|
[19]
|
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
|
[20]
|
Maggi, J., Butera, F., Legrenzi, P., & Mugny, G. (1998). Relevance of information and social influence in the pseudodiagnosticity bias. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 188-199.
|
[21]
|
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Dragan, W. (1993). Information relevance, working memory, and the consideration of alternatives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 759-778.
|
[22]
|
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Sullivan, J. A. (1991). Data selection in a minimal hypothesis testing task. Acta Psychologica, 76, 293-305. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(91)90023-S
|
[23]
|
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.608
|
[24]
|
Oaksford, M., Chater, N., Grainger, B., & Larkin, J. (1997). Optimal data selection in the reduced array selection task (RAST). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 441-458. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.441
|
[25]
|
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Villejoubert, G. (2010). Information relevance in pseudodiagnostic reasoning. In S. Ohlsson, & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1172-1177). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
|
[26]
|
Villejoubert, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2012). Relevance-driven information search in “pseudodiagnostic” reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 541-552.
doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.617830
|
[27]
|
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140. doi:10.1080/17470216008416717
|