Self-reported ischemic heart disease: Prevalence, sociodemographics, health behavior, health-care utilization, and quality of life

Abstract

The aim of this study was to present the prevalence of self-reported Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) based on a national population-based survey and to characterize people with self-reported IHD with respect to health behavior, risk factors, health-care services utilization and health-related HRQoL; further to compare people with self-reported IHD to those with other chronic illness and people without chronic illness. Based on the Danish Health Interview Survey 2005 (SUSY), a sample of 10,983 persons aged 35 years or older was examined. Data was collected through personal interviews (response rate = 66.7%) and self-administered questionnaires (51.5%). The sample was divided into three mutual exclusive groups: IHD; other chronic illnesses; and no chronic illness. The prevalence of IHD was 5.6% (5.2 - 6.0). The disease was more common in men than women, and the average age was 67.5 years. People with self-reported IHD were characterized as having poorer health behaviors; more risk factors: 40% smokers, 21% sedentary lifestyle, 26% obese; higher utilization of the health-care services; and poorer HRQoL. When compared to people with other chronic diseases, people with IHD continued to show the same characteristics. The IHD group had more problems affecting their daily lives than the other two groups. The issues that affected the people with IHD have also been shown to increase the load on the health-care system. Therefore, it is important to the patients, health-care, and society that the prevalence of IHD is reduced and the burden of disease is made a priority.

Share and Cite:

Alphin, S. , Kjøller, M. , Davidsen, M. , Nissen, N. and Zwisler, A. (2012) Self-reported ischemic heart disease: Prevalence, sociodemographics, health behavior, health-care utilization, and quality of life. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2, 240-248. doi: 10.4236/ojpm.2012.22035.

1. INTRODUCTION

In 2005, the World Health Organization projected that 60% of the deaths worldwide would be caused by chronic diseases [1]. The top four chronic diseases are: cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes [1]. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death, responsible for 30% of all deaths worldwide [1,2]. However, mortality from cardiovascular disease has declined over the past decade in many Western countries [1], including Denmark [3].

As the mortality rates have declined in Denmark, there has been a documented increase in the rate of hospitalization due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) [3]. This reflects changes in morbidity, risk factor modification, and the treatment of IHD within the healthcare system [3]. Thus, the improved survival rate implies that more people are living with the disease and IHD appears to be transforming from a fatal to a chronic disease.

The impact of chronic disease is both a major cost and economic burden to individuals, health systems, and societies [1]. Furthermore, chronic diseases are slow to develop and can lead to compounding medical complications, premature death, and lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [2]. In Denmark it has been reported that individuals with heart disease cost the healthcare system on average 3196 more per person than individuals without heart disease [4].

Previous research conducted with people living with IHD has mainly been based on data from national or regional hospital registries [3-5], however this data only reflects the number of people with chronic IHD in contact with the healthcare system. From a public health perspective, it is important to know how many people are living in society with chronic IHD and how their everyday life is affected.

In cross-sectional surveys among people aged > 50 years, Oldridge and Stump found a significantly greater likelihood of limitation of activity and poor or fair selfrated health among respondents with heart disease compared to people with other kinds of chronic illness [5]. No similar studies have given a broader description of how health behavior, HRQoL, and use of health services are affected among people living with IHD. Health behavior, or prevalence of risk factors for heart diseases, are well-known in relation to the general population [5] and cardiac patients [6-8]. Most of the information on HRQoL among people with IHD is based on follow-up studies of hospitalized patients [9,10], while information is lacking on the HRQoL of people living with chronic IHD outside of the healthcare setting.

The aim of this study is to present the prevalence of self-reported IHD based on a national population-based survey and to characterize people with self-reported IHD with respect to health behavior, risk factors, health-care services utilization and health-related HRQoL; further to compare people with self-reported IHD to those with other chronic illness and people without chronic illness.

2. METHODS

2.1. Sample

The Danish Health Interview Survey 2005 (SUSY) was conducted by the National Institute of Public Health [5]. The purpose of the survey was to describe the status and trends in health and morbidity in the adult population and the factors that influence health status, including health behavior and health habits, lifestyles, environmental and occupational health risks and health resources [5]. The study was based on a representative sample of 21,183 Danes aged 16 or older. The data was collected by personal interview in the respondent’s home followed by a self-administered questionnaire distributed after the interview [5]. The questions for both the interview [11] and the self-administered questionnaire [12] can be found elsewhere. There were 14,566 interviews conducted at a response rate of 66.7% and 11,238 self-administered questionnaires were returned at a response rate of 51.5% [5]. Using the SUSY 2005 data, a sample of 10,983 respondents aged 35 years or older was obtained; 17 were excluded because of missing data.

2.2. Clinical and Demographic Measures

During the interview participants were asked two key questions, with subsequent follow-up questions. First they were asked, “Do you have any chronic disease, disorder or illness, chronic effects of injury, any functional impairment or any other chronic health problem?” If the answer was “yes”, then the participant was asked two follow-up questions: “What kind of disease?” and “Where in your body is the disease located?” The second key question asked them specifically, “Do you now or have you previously had a heart attack (myocardial infarction) or angina pectoris?”

Based on the interview responses the study sample was divided into three mutually exclusive groups:

• Participants with IHD: respondents giving a “yes” answer to one or both questions (n = 630);

• Participants with other chronic illnesses (e.g. musculoskeletal disease, respiratory disease, diseases of the nervous system) (n = 4353);

• Participants with no chronic illness (n = 5983).

All reported chronic illnesses were subsequently coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10). The chronic illness breakdown is illustrated for both the IHD group and other chronic illness group in Table 1.

The other data collected can be categorized into seven major areas: sociodemographic, health behaviors, risk factors, healthcare system utilization, medication use, social relations and HRQoL. Standard socio-demographic data was collected during the interview including: gender, age, cohabitation status and educational level. The questions concerning health behaviors and risk factors included smoking pattern, level of physical activity, dietary intake, prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, use of preventive check-ups, self-efficacy [13] and height/ weight for BMI calculations.

Six questions in the interview addressed the use of physician services within the past three months and four questions asked about the use of other health-care providers within the same time period. Participants were also asked if they were regularly taking medication. Questions concerning quality of life included social relations, self-rated health, chronic activity limitations and self-rated HRQoL. There were three questions regarding social relations during the interview. Self-rated HRQoL measurement were collected from the self-administered questionnaire and based on the SF-36 [14,15]. Questions on sexual activity were also included in the self-administered questionnaire.

2.3. Data Analysis and Statisitics

Raw prevalence and 95% confidence intervals are presented for the IHD group only. When comparing the three groups prevalences are adjusted for both age and gender and presented with 95% confidence intervals. To test for equal prevalences in the groups, a test for conditional independence [16] was used which takes into account the discrete nature of risk factors. All analyses were performed in SAS, version 9.1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and chronic illness of people with self-reported ischemic heart disease (IHD), other chronic illness and no chronic illness.

3. RESULTS

A total of 630 respondents reported having IHD, corresponding to 5.6% (95% CI 5.2% - 6.0%) of adult Danes aged 35 years or older. Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics. There were more men than women in the IHD group, and people with IHD were an average of 10 years older than those with other chronic illness and almost 14 years older than those without illness. Corresponding to the age differences, the IHD group included more widowers than the other groups, even after age and gender were controlled. Educational level was clearly lower in the IHD group.

3.1. Cormorbidity

The comorbidities for the IHD group and the other chronic illness group are shown in Table 1. Some of the respondents in the IHD group reported other chronic illnesses in addition IHD. The IHD group’s most reported diseases included: musculoskeletal disease (23.6%); endocrine/metabolic disease (14.0%); respiratory disease (10.4%); nervous system disease (7.3%); and other injuries (5.0%). The other chronic illness group’s major chronic diseases are as follows: musculoskeletal disease (40.5%), endocrine/metabolic disease (13.0%), nervous system disease (12.7%), respiratory disease (12.4%) and other injuries (10.1%).

3.2. Health Behavior and Risk Factors

Health behavior and risk factors among people with IHD differed significantly from the two other groups (Table 2). The IHD group had fewer “never smokers” but more “smokers” and “former smokers” compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). The IHD group is more sedentary and participating in less in heavy physical activity, however there is little difference between the three groups in regards to self-reported moderate physical activity. Dietary behavior also did not differ between the groups. Obesity, as represented by BMI, was significantly more prevalent in the IHD group (26.0%; (95% CI: 20.5% - 31.5%)) than in the group with other chronic illness (15.8%; (95% CI: 14.7% - 16.9%)) and the group without illness (9.6%; (95% CI: 8.8% - 10.4%)) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, people with IHD had lower selfefficacy (confidence that their own effort is important in staying healthy [12]). Attendance for preventive health check-ups was significantly more frequent in the IHD group (87.8%); (95% CI: 84.1% - 91.5%) than in the group with other illness (70.6%); (95% CI: 69.2% - 71.9%) and in the group with no illness (54.2%); (95% CI: 53.0% - 55.5%) (p < 0.001). Similar patterns were seen for blood pressure and cholesterol preventive visits. Hypertension and diabetes, which are well-known risk factors for IHD, were significantly more prevalent in the IHD group compared to the other two groups.

3.3. Use of Health-Care Services

Health-care utilization varied considerably between the two disease groups and the group without disease (Table 3). Use of general practitioners, outpatient clinics and hospitalization was significantly more frequent in the IHD group than in the group with other chronic illness. A total of 84.4% of the IHD group stated that they regularly or continually took medicine and this proportion was significantly higher than the chronic illness group (69.7%) and the group without illnesses (26.7%).

3.4. Quality of Life

Table 4 shows various indicators of HRQoL including social relations, self-rated health, chronic activity limitations, self-rated HRQoL and sexual activity. Both the IHD group and the group with other illnesses had significantly poorer social relations than people without illness. The IHD group also rated their own health as significantly poorer than the two other groups and the groups with illness reported more activity limitations than the group without illness.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Tunstall-Pedoe, H. (2005) Preventing chronic diseases. A vital investment: WHO global report. World Health Organization, Geneva, 200 p. http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/en/
[2] Meetoo, D. (2008) Chronic diseases: The silent global epidemic. British Journal of Nursing, 17, 1320-1325.
[3] Abildstrom, S.Z., Rasmussen, S. and Madsen, M. (2002) Significant decline in case fatality after acute myocardial infarction in Denmark—A population-based study from 1994 to 2001. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 36, 287-291. doi:10.1080/140174302320774492
[4] Kruse, M., Davidsen, M., Madsen, M., Gyrd-Hansen, D. and Sorensen, J. (2008) Costs of heart disease and risk behavior: Implications for expenditure on prevention. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 36, 850-856. doi:10.1177/1403494808095955
[5] Ekholm, O., Hesse, U., Davidsen, M. and Kj?ller, M. (2009) The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37, 758-765. doi:10.1177/1403494809341095
[6] Oldridge, N.B. and Stump, T.E. (2004) Heart disease, comorbidity, and activity limitation in community-dwelling elderly. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 11, 427-434.
[7] Taylor, R.S., Brown, A., Ebrahim, S., Jolliffe, J., Noorani, H., Rees, K., et al. (2004) Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Medicine, 116, 682-692. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009
[8] Leon, A.S., Franklin, B.A., Costa, F., Balady, G.J., Berr, K.A., Stewart, K.J., et al. (2005) Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Circulation, 111, 369-376. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000151788.08740.5C
[9] Dempster, M. and Donnelly, M. (2000) Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischemic heart disease. Heart, 83, 641-644. doi:10.1136/heart.83.6.641
[10] Brown, N., Melville, M., Gray, D., Young, T., Munro, J., Skene, A.M., et al. (1999) Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: Short form 36 scores compared with a normal population. Heart, 81, 352-358.
[11] National Institute of Public Health. (2006) Danish health interview survey 2005: Questionnaire for personal inter- views with response frequencies. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen. http://www.niph.dk/upload/2005_questionnaire_for_personal_interviews_with_response_frequencies.pdf
[12] National Institute of Public Health. (2006) Danish health interview survey 2005: Self administered questionnaire 1. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen. http://www.niph.dk/upload/2005_self-administrated_questionnaire_i.pdf
[13] Sarkar, U., Ali, S. and Whooley, M.A. (2009) Self-efficacy as a marker of cardiac function and predictor of heart failure hospitalization and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease: Findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Health Psychology, 28, 166-173. doi:10.1037/a0013146
[14] Bjorner, J.B., Thunedborg, K., Kristensen, T.S., Modvig, J. and Bech, P. (1998) The Danish SF-36 health survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 991-999. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00091-2
[15] McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E. Jr., Lu, J.F. and Sherbourne, C.D. (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40-66. doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004
[16] Whittaker, J. (2008) Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex,
[17] Primatesta, P., Allender, S., Ciccarelli, P., Doring, A., Graff- Iversen, S., Holub, J., et al. (2007) Cardiovascular surveys: Manual of operations. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 14, S43-S61. doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000277988.18096.3b
[18] Vogeli, C., Shields, A.E., Lee, T.A., Gibson, T.B., Marder, W.D., Weiss, K.B., et al. (2007) Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 391-395. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1
[19] Rasmussen, L.B., Matthiessen, J., Biltoft-Jensen, A. and Tetens, I. (2007) Characteristics of misreporters of dietary intake and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition, 10, 230-237. doi:10.1017/S136898000724666X
[20] Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas. F., et al. (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet, 364, 937-952. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9
[21] Lorig, K.R. and Holman, H. (2003) Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 1-7. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01
[22] Lau-Walker, M. (2007) Importance of illness beliefs and self-efficacy for patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 187-198. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04398.x
[23] Idler, E.L. and Benyamini, Y. (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21-37. doi:10.2307/2955359
[24] Due, P., Holstein, B., Lund, R., Modvig, J. and Avlund, K. (1999) Social relations: Network, support and relational strain. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 661-673. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00381-5
[25] Berkman, L.F. (1995) The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 245-254.
[26] Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., Ware, J.E. Jr., Aaronson, N.K., Mosconi, P., et al. (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life As- sessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 13, 283-298. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05
[27] Klein, R., Baron, E., Klein, J. and Benbenishty, R. (2007) The impact of sexual therapy on patients after cardiac events participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 14, 672-678. doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282eea52d
[28] Drory, Y., Kravetz, S. and Weingarten, M. (2000) Comparison of sexual activity of women and men after a first acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 85, 1283-1287. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00756-6
[29] Cassar, A., Holmes, D.R. Jr., Rihal, C.S. and Gersh, B.J. (2009) Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 84, 1130-1146. doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0391
[30] Wenger, N.K. (2008) Current status of cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51, 1619-1631. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.030

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.