Share This Article:

Relations between Teachers’ Goal Orientations, Their Instructional Practices and Students’ Motivation

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:1039KB) PP. 572-584
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.47083    4,073 Downloads   6,301 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Relations between teachers’ goal orientations, their instructional practices as expressed in perceived classroom goal structures and students’ goal orientations were analyzed, focusing also on potential moderators. Results of a questionnaire study with 46 Mathematics teachers and their 930 students supported the assumption that teachers’ goal orientations affect their instructional practices and students’ goal orientations. These effects were, in part, moderated by teacher beliefs (implicit theories, self-efficacy beliefs). Overall, the results provided strong support for the notion that the mechanisms underlying these effects are based on the functionality of certain instructional practices for the attainment of teachers’ goals.

Cite this paper

Dresel, M. , Fasching, M. , Steuer, G. , Nitsche, S. & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Relations between Teachers’ Goal Orientations, Their Instructional Practices and Students’ Motivation. Psychology, 4, 572-584. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.47083.

References

[1] Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
[2] Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338-375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338
[3] Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientation and association with teachers’ help-seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 241-252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.241
[4] Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2008). Achievement goals for teaching as predictors of students’ perceptions of instructional practices and students’ help seeking and cheating. Learning and Instruction, 18, 453-467. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.004
[5] Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[6] Dickhauser, O., Butler, R., & Tonjes, B. (2007). That just shows I can’t do it: Goal orientation and attitudes concerning help among preservice teachers. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 39, 120-126. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.39.3.120
[7] Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
[8] Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
[9] Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
[10] Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122-140). New York: Guilford Press.
[11] Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
[12] Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York: Guildford.
[13] Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
[14] Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
[15] Fasching, M. S., Dresel, M., Dickhauser, O., & Nitsche, S. (2011). Goal orientations of teacher trainees: Longitudinal analysis of magnitude, change and relevance. Journal of Educational Research Online, 2, 9-33.
[16] Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A metaanalysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48-73. doi:10.1037/a0026223
[17] Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-211. doi:10.1348/000709902158847
[18] Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goals structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[19] Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06
[20] Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 529-545. doi:10.1007/BF03173470
[21] Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77-104). New York: Routledge.
[22] Malmberg, L.-E. (2008). Student teachers’ achievement goal orientations during teacher studies: Antecedents, correlates and outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18, 438-452. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.003
[23] Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
[24] Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., Urdan, T. et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
[25] Moller, A. C., & Elliot, A. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In A. Mittel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307-326). New York: Nova Science.
[26] Munger, G. F., & Loyd, B. H. (1988). The use of multiple matrix sampling for survey research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 187-191.
[27] Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance. Psychological Review, 941, 328-346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
[28] Nitsche, S., Dickhauser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2011). Rethinking teachers’ goal orientations: Conceptual and methodological enhancements. Learning and Instruction, 21, 574-586. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.12.001
[29] Papaioannou, A., & Christodoulidis, T. (2007). A measure of teachers’ achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 27, 349-361. doi:10.1080/01443410601104148
[30] Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 35-58. doi:10.1086/499692
[31] Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556. doi:10.3102/00346543074004525
[32] Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
[33] Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6 for Windows (Computer software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
[34] Retelsdorf, J., Butler, R., Streblow, L., & Schiefele, U. (2010). Teachers’ goal orientations for teaching: Associations with instructional practices, interest in teaching, and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 20, 34-43. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.001
[35] Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 152-171. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x
[36] Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2011). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance classroom goals and the adoption of personal achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 680-699. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02012.x
[37] Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
[38] Smits, N., & Vorst, H. C. M. (2007). Reducing the length of questionnaires through structurally incomplete designs: An illustration. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 25-34. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.005
[39] Spinath, B., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Schone, C., & Dickhauser, O. (2002). Scales to assess learning and achievement motivation. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
[40] Tonjes, B., Dickhouser, O., & Kroner, S. (2008). Goal orientation and perceived lack of achievement in teachers. Zeitschrift für Padagogische Psychologie, 22, 151-160. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.22.2.151
[41] Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88
[42] Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181-193. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181
[43] Woolfolk-Hoy, A., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627-653). New York: Routledge.
[44] Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., & Stoeger, H. (2008). Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 643-654. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.643

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.